Zpbe AP: 2 women gangraped by 4 in under-construction paper mill
Hyderabad: The Anti-Corruption Bureau ACB has completed 64 years of its glorious service on Thursday, January 2. The ACB, which initially worked as erstwhile X branch under the Crime Investigation Department CID till January 1, 1961, took its form on January 2, 1961, with S Vijaya Rangam as its first director. He had also served as the Hyderabad City police commissioner from May 19, 1957, to May 13, 1959. S Vijaya Rangam, the first director of ACB in the undivided Andhra Pradesh The bureau started functioning with its first headquarters stanley becher located at Ramkoti, after which it was shifted to Troop Bazaar in 1975, Abids in 1981 and Moazzam Jahi Market in 1985, before being shifted to its permanent office in Banjara Hills in 2013. Over the years, the Bureau has consistently vaso stanley strived towards excellence and built trust in public by achieving its goal with the dedication and hard work. Our performance has been defined by utmost commitment in working honestly, objectively and sincerely, read the statement issued by the d stanley uk irector general of Telangana ACB on Thursday, marking the milestone. Also ReadHyderabad woman loses Rs 1.58 cr to cybercrime, police recover Rs 70L Telangana ACB achieves 64% conviction rate in 2024 In 2024, Telangana ACB registered a total of 152 cases, in which 223 accused were arrested. Among them were 129 trap cases involving the arrest of 200 accused 159 government servants , 11 disproportionate assets cases against government servants, and 12 Hyzo SP may finally get Leader of Oppn position in UP Vidhan Parishad
New Delhi: Protocol facilities made available to judges should not be used in a manner which causes inconvenience to others or brings public criticism to the judiciary, Chief stanley cup usa Justice D Y Chandrachud has said in a letter to the chief justices of all the high courts. The CJI in his letter expresse stanley cup d displeasure over a recent incident in which a judge of the Allahabad High Court sought explanation from railway authorities for not meeting his requirements during a train journey. A Judge of the High Court does not possess disciplinary jurisdiction over railway personnel. Hence, there was no occasion for an officer of the High Court to call for an explanation from the railway personnel to be placed before His Lordship for kind perusal ;. Also ReadSC Collegium is vibrant, active committed to its task: CJI Chandrachud Evidently, the officer of the High Court in the above communication was carrying out a direction of the Judge of the High Court in this instance the Hon ;ble Judge has desired ; , the CJI said in the letter dated July 19. In his letter, Chandrachud said communication which has been addressed by an officer of the High Court to the General Manager of the Railway establishment has given rise to justifiable disq stanley becher uiet both within and outside the judiciary. Protocol facilities ; which are made available to Judges should not be utilised to assert a claim to privilege which sets them a |
